Cadre vs Vae

by Ronner • 13 May 2007, 21:03 • Journals
And once again it has been shown that the Mobile MG is an overpowered piece of crap that should've been left out of the cfg, together with the mortar, ages ago.

discuss

(oh and I'm not biased to any of the teams, just to be sure)
Comments
73
▼
ng 13 May 2007, 22:03
you are right ronner!
▼
woot 13 May 2007, 22:03
vae got bashed nothing more:)
▼
walle 13 May 2007, 22:04
soldier class is overpowered! and mines. and riflenade.
▼
Spirea 13 May 2007, 23:39
idd 6on6 should be played with 3on3 cfg as well!
Parent
▼
Rhand 13 May 2007, 22:04
Nope, I like it. It adds a little lottofactor to maps like Radar and stuff.
▼
Ronner 13 May 2007, 22:06
you like "lottofactor" ?

seriously, what moron made you an EC-Admin.
Parent
▼
miho 13 May 2007, 22:45
i have to agree with you.
Parent
▼
Rhand 13 May 2007, 22:46
Adacore I believe. Besides, I still have to encounter the first big mistake I made this EC which would allow you to call the supervisor who accepted me "a moron".

And lottomaps like Adlernest do have given us a lot of really nice games, spectatorwise.
Parent
▼
bullvox 13 May 2007, 23:16
wat heeft dit ermee te maken dat de mg er is?
Parent
▼
Sheep 13 May 2007, 22:06
lotto shouldnt have a place in ET, should expect an admin to know that
Parent
▼
Rhand 13 May 2007, 22:45
A little lotto is better for the viewer tbh.

And why should an admin "know" that? The only thing I do is write decent reports and be on the server, nothing more and nothing less.
Parent
▼
sol 13 May 2007, 22:52
Players come before viewers, at least they should.
Parent
▼
Rhand 13 May 2007, 22:54
I know that, nor did I implied something else. I just said it was good for the viewers.
Parent
▼
squalli 13 May 2007, 22:58
mines shouldnt be allowed either, only smg engi, then ET would be perfect game!
Parent
▼
twidi 13 May 2007, 22:08
what exactly is lotto in mg? it might be overpowered, but can't see anything lotto in it :l
Parent
▼
Rhand 13 May 2007, 22:44
When there are 25-30 seconds left to go on a map, everyone thinks Axis will fullhold you but suddenly a MG takes out 4 guys and Allies still win I call that lucky. Hence the MG adds a little lottofactor to the game.
Parent
▼
alhric 13 May 2007, 23:00
thats not luck, call it skill (:D) or call it "lame", but not luck imho
Parent
▼
walle 13 May 2007, 23:02
thats nothing more than fuckup from axis side to let that MG have a place to shoot on.
Parent
▼
Rhand 13 May 2007, 23:07
You could call it that, but I stick to my opinion.
Parent
▼
taLa 13 May 2007, 22:56
you pulled the same trick on us :<
=:o)
Parent
▼
Iron 13 May 2007, 22:05
na, its just skilled
▼
Scarce 13 May 2007, 22:05
no mg, no img
▼
Heidenreich 13 May 2007, 22:05
lol u r biased to one of the teams
▼
Ronner 13 May 2007, 22:06
no. I'm not
Parent
▼
twidi 13 May 2007, 22:07
I would just like to ask that why other clans can't do the same if mg is so overpowered then? or do some teams just rather lose than use mg?
▼
butchji 13 May 2007, 22:08
Because you are the mastererer of MG. (beside pumu)
Parent
▼
Ronner 13 May 2007, 22:09
The point was not wether or not teams will use it or if they think it's lame to use it. I also never implied it was lame of you to use it, it's possible with the current config so if you want to use it, you are entitled to. I just think it should not be in the CB config for a long time already because it simply is an overpowered weapon or do you disagree.
Parent
▼
pumu 13 May 2007, 23:09
yeah dunno XD
its a feature
imo rifle is more lame
it can even shoot around corners etc
Parent
▼
Ronner 13 May 2007, 22:10
really. Prozac.. it might help
▼
vegi 13 May 2007, 22:10
no comment
▼
Ronner 13 May 2007, 22:11
"ok"

(wtf?)
▼
Ronner 13 May 2007, 22:12
REALLY.. go see a shrink dude.
▼
Heidenreich 13 May 2007, 22:14
omg n1 :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
▼
walle 13 May 2007, 22:16
this mg42 thing ain't never been discussed before (afaik) and even parodia / idle used to have it sometimes, for example in map like radar to break west-defence.

now, when lottonoskillmg42onlyimg-clan gets a nice hit with it is topic to discuss about. XD
▼
chaoZ 13 May 2007, 22:23
you got the point !
Parent
▼
Hope 13 May 2007, 22:23
nonsense
▼
dNzl 13 May 2007, 22:31
its lame
▼
Kiewan 13 May 2007, 22:39
whine more and learn how to play et
▼
Cya 13 May 2007, 22:41
mg42 is Teh weapon
▼
faesti 13 May 2007, 22:51
Just shut the fuck up. It's in the game, if you dont like it, then die of aids and go fuck your self. thank you and have a nice day fuck off <34
▼
slajdan 13 May 2007, 22:51
I think IC will take this EC.
▼
perforator 13 May 2007, 23:09
ice climbers don't play ET i'm sorry :/
Parent
▼
slajdan 14 May 2007, 00:27
they better start then or they will have to use häx to win this EC.
Parent
▼
rdcl 13 May 2007, 22:55
boeie laat ze gewoon derin man, dadelyk alleen nog mp40 en thompson over :S ban de airstrikes en arti's dan ook maar en panzer watever!
▼
dejx 13 May 2007, 22:57
riflenade is mroe overpowered imo
▼
Phemon 13 May 2007, 23:04
agree, remove mg42!
▼
phun 13 May 2007, 23:07
On Oasis, GRush, Radar MG's not a big deal, but in some bran, frostbite hallways it's impossible to escape it (it's like using pf on et_vallhala).
▼
pumu 13 May 2007, 23:11
ever seen mg on braundorf or frostbite??
Ofc not, because it doesnt make sense on these maps as you can be shoot easily
Parent
▼
aeq 13 May 2007, 23:10
may i ask what happened?
▼
Sainted 13 May 2007, 23:14
ÌC owned vae with MG in the last 20 sec of radar
Parent
▼
Iron 13 May 2007, 23:16
ic got west parts 20secs before the end, because mg shot 3-4 guys down from the west. parts were secured around 5 secs before the end.

and btw like some ppl say that its luck. its not luck, its just "lame". Its part of the cb config (thanks for that) so we have to live with it :l
Parent
▼
aeq 13 May 2007, 23:21
Well, maybe it was great anticipation by the cadre player? It takes some guts to take MG @ EC playoffs at this stage! Will watch replay tomorrow.

O, and I can understand what you mean because MG's can be fuckn lame when they r being used against you, but then again it is only after people have been wronged that they claim it should be removed. Nobody was talking about this yesterday...
Parent
▼
Iron 13 May 2007, 23:25
well it was actually. when there was 3 minutes left, I had in mind that they probably would take mg. when one minute left, I had already forgot it xd

and yes, discussion started now only because they won a map because of it, naturally.
Parent
▼
aeq 13 May 2007, 23:27
hm, dunno if yur being sarcastic on me or not :D?

Anyway, id better wait till I have seen the match untill i further comment!
Parent
▼
Iron 13 May 2007, 23:29
im not sarcastic :[
Parent
▼
aeq 13 May 2007, 23:30
okidoki :). Lets continue tomorrow!
Parent
▼
OVER9000BPM 13 May 2007, 23:31
seriously guys, u cant remove every part of the game, only because its so called "overpowered".
What is the panza then in ur oppinion? A good placed panza kills 5-6 players, if its spawnrape, then they even have fullspawn, that is much more powerfull then an mg takin out 4 guys imo/b]
▼
Spirea 13 May 2007, 23:55
idd remove panzer at least!
Parent
▼
OVER9000BPM 14 May 2007, 00:13
;-)

just leave everything like its now.
Parent
▼
teente 13 May 2007, 23:39
"should've been left out of the cfg, together with the mortar, ages ago."

I've been saying that since mortar was banned xD
▼
Blindi 14 May 2007, 00:19
Finland MulSun mg-takut pwnt someone?
▼
ngotie 14 May 2007, 00:25
MG ROCKS! The best team won!
▼
hAn 14 May 2007, 04:11
airstrike , supported fire , mortar , rifle , pf , mg , flamethrower
out and we have a new objective based counter strike :P
▼
DoctorWho 14 May 2007, 14:11
aint riflenade overpowered? and medics with medpacks?they have 220 hp + regeneration...
▼
mesq 14 May 2007, 17:12
you should watch our game vs cadre at bremen.. :)
Back to top